This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Uber executive Emil Michaels got in hot water this week amidst news that he had threatened to hire researchers to dig up dirt on hostile journalists, or more specifically, Sara Lacy – and spread dirt about her personal life. The episode brought more negative attention to Uber.
So is native advertising (sometimes called brand journalism or, more generally, content marketing) a curse or cure all? Peretti started BuzzFeed, which eschews banners and has become a model for the possibilities of so-called native ads to finance journalism. Is it good for what ails online advertising?
Of course, the LinkedIn audience is of great interest to brands and business publishers alike: Anyone who has ever published a news story can tell you that it’s nice to have readers.
Trust in social media and journalism are at an all-time low. Digital media and ads continue to grow as journalism and organic social suffer, ad fraud continues to be a problem, and mistrust between all in the ecosystem prevails. Facebook’s problems have cast a pall over the social platform space.
The problem is bigger than PR and even journalism. Yet journalism can combat fake news. PR has always had to decide how far to push rhetoric, persuasion, and yes, hype. But this is not just about ethics. Today, the very notions of truth, science, and facts are under assault like never before. make reality far too malleable.
The second ran in the NY Times : How Facebook is Changing the Way its Users Consume Journalism. The first was in Digiday , it highlighted LinkedIn’s growing clout as a curator of business news (see my post). What do these trends mean for PR? After all, it is challenging enough to get coverage.
Last night the Daily Show reported that the Chinese government is clamping down on a journalism scourge that confuses citizens and can poison their minds – namely wordplay, that’s right, puns. This week I share a few articles that support and refute this perception.
PR pro and blogger Frank Strong recently wrote about challenges confronting journalism and the PR profession. Ultimately, great stories drive PR and journalism. Even those who think they know PR may be surprised to learn that the job has gotten more difficult. Company Culture, Startup Stories, Exec Profiles.
The Journal featured a book review yesterday for Orin Hargraves’ It’s Been Said Before. I was really excited because the article described a whole book about clichés and, let’s face it, I have no life (OK, I have a life, is it really so bad to be fascinated with words and language)?
Is this a sign of the future of PR (and journalism)? I asked Lin if she’d answer a few questions, and she agreed; read on for the Q and A: Journalists have called PR the Dark Side, now quite a few wear both hats. I definitely think that it is.
Back in the day we used to joke that every startup just wanted to be in the Wall Street Journal. To a lesser extent newspapers like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. What these people add to their Flipboard/check daily, etc. Thanks everyone! Getting really good ideas. TechCrunch, or not TechCrunch? xda-developers.
There have been the predictable media responses about impact on journalism, echo chambers and trivializing of news. Facebook has caught the news “car”, now what does it do? They seem to be playing all sides, trying to make everyone happy while increasing their influence.
Public editors still need to look after the public interest, hold powerful forces accountable, and explain to audiences how and why journalism works as it does — but to do so they need to speak and shape a new language of news platform ethics.”. He writes: “Today, it is harder to say where newsrooms stop and audiences begin.
Wall Street Journal: When it Comes to Tech Services, Cloud can be a Nebulous Term. I always say “promise less, deliver more”, but the following articles detail journalists’ frustrations about overstated capabilities in cloud services and DevOps. The Register : Whew! How to tell if a DevOps biz is peddling a load of manure.
January 2017 – The company reveals a Journalism Project ; incentives and programs to encourage media partnerships. December 2016 – Zuck says Facebook is ” not a traditional media company ,” but “we feel responsible for how it is used.”. January 2017 – They hire Campbell Brown , former TV news anchor, to lead news partnerships.
It should especially be of interest to people in creative and info-driven fields like marketing, journalism and PR. But new research shows that the biggest threat may be to our creativity.
It should especially be of interest to people in creative and info-driven fields like marketing, journalism and PR. But new research shows that the biggest threat may be to our creativity.
The clients are concerned about “digital ad quality, effectiveness, digital ad fraud… [and want] assurances that ads won’t run alongside inappropriate content,” according to Wall Street Journal. The publication wrote again today about lower global ad spending.
But the Wall Street Journal’s Deepa Seetharaman saw something more insidious: Facebook researchers last year ranked 500 news sites based on how popular they were with the social network’s users who identified their political alignment as conservative or liberal.
Pretend journalism – claim to be a news source but is a curator (Daily Kos). Andrew Bridges, lawyer of the platforms would have us believe there are many types of “fake news” Seven, to be exact: Research and reporting with a pretense of being objective (e.g., major newspapers).
Aaron Zamost’s Medium post rang eerily true to those in the tech marketing, journalism and PR worlds. The story, about the tyranny of “Silicon Valley Time,” was widely read and shared then. His subtitle said it all: The tech press moves like clockwork, fitting company narratives into a predictable arc.
Aaron Zamost’s Medium post rang eerily true for those in the tech marketing, journalism and PR worlds. The story, about the tyranny of “Silicon Valley Time,” was widely read and shared. His subtitle said it all: The tech press moves like clockwork, fitting company narratives into a predictable arc.
This latest in our PR in Asia series was contributed by guest blogger Eiffy Luo , a multimedia story teller who discovered her passion for business and journalism through work at TheStreet.com , Reuters and the New York Times.
Colleagues and coworkers compared notes and shared info – my good friend Judy Gombita sent this exit interview of Matthew Ingram, from Columbia Journalism Review. The next day, there were many tweets and articles that sought to explain what happened, such as these stories on Digiday and TNW.
The moderator ( Mickey Graham of Work-Bench ) asked great questions, and the panelists answered – it was all very amiable and informative (I thought there might be more fireworks, given the competition in tech journalism). Some common themes emerged. Warm intros help. You should know the reporter and publication, and tailor the pitch.
I attended the Daily News Innovation Lab’s session: Proposition: We can Solve the Fake News Problem. It featured an Oxford-style debate on whether there’s a solution to the fake news problem. Some very smart people from the worlds of media, business, and technology made great arguments for each side.
Last month I interviewed top PR and social media experts about the challenges facing online marketing. The following recap includes some of the juiciest quotes from Neal Schaffer , Frank Strong , Drew Neisser , and Deb Weinstein. I also share my views (not necessarily the agency’s ) and pose additional questions.
It’s like we went to sleep in late 2016 and woke up with a post-election New Years, fake news, post-truth hangover. Before, we generally believed in the sanctity of truth and reason. Now nothing seems real, and it is hard to know what to hold onto. Much of this tracks back to the growing role of tech in our lives.
By now, content marketing has become an important part of almost every PR’s arsenal. We’ve become an army of bloggers and article writers. And why not? Content is the motive force for today’s noisy internet. It offers more runway to tell stories, share messages and drive thought leadership than the typical press mention.
Most PR people are familiar with journalistic conventions. Things like AP style, for example. We know a story starts with the lede , not lead, and about the reverse triangle approach to news writing. We know what a byline is, and are constantly on the hunt for the people behind them, to pitch stories to.
I can honestly say I have never experienced a more exciting, opportunity-laden time for PR pros to flex our strategic, ROI generating creative muscles, and prove our worth in the business world since I hopped the fence from journalism to found Strategic Objectives (our Toronto-based PR agency dedicated to helping brands tell better, more effective, (..)
It is the reality that Internet culture has given us today; where content is there for the taking, to be riffed on, often ripped off, repackaged, bookmarked, collated, aggregated, discovered, shared and curated; in which content is commoditized and journalism has been torn asunder.
It is the reality that Internet culture has given us today; where content is there for the taking, to be riffed on, often ripped off, repackaged, bookmarked, collated, aggregated, discovered, linked, shared and curated; in which content is commoditized and journalism has been torn asunder.
The free Internet has left journalism reeling and savaged creative fields like writing, music and photography. Curiously, consumers seemed chiefly concerned about losing out on their precious memes. As I said in my last post, it might not be a bad thing, if the European Directive were adopted.
Some journalism startups aim to breathe fresh life into storytelling, and we might learn a thing or two that has applications for PR and content marketing. That is why I enjoyed the demo night at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism early this week. The post CUNY Meetup Showcases Journalism Startups appeared first on.
One replied via email: “Tech journalism has become so difficult that it is now all about the page-clicks. The team did a great job of scheduling reporters to come to demo rooms in several major cities. However, we did run into resistance, especially from the major tech blogs.
I love to check out reports from Tow Center for Digital Journalism and Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. I wanted to learn what the research revealed about our news consumption habits and tech’s impact on journalism. Some of the highlights she presented include: 86% say platforms reduce trust in journalism.
Reporters are under pressures that might discourage good old shoe leather journalism, as news cycles diminish and many are incentivized by quantity and clicks (a trend driven by – you guessed it – tech). I don’t mean to imply that all (or even most) of the media are clueless about tech.
The Dangers of Twitter journalism. An interesting debate that followed was about the role of social media and especially Twitter in fanning the flames of knee-jerk journalism. Journalism is that conversation. People close to the story could – but even their versions can be clouded by bias. Democracy is that conversation.
I saw an article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday which made me wonder where all this is going. It’s tempting to play it safe, but companies and their leaders are either being dragged into politics or proactively taking stands and speaking out. What does this mean for the arts of messaging and brand development?
The Journal article explains it well. Previously, it was thought that nothing could escape the clutches of a black hole. There is some very complex quantum physics ideas here, and I won’t even try to get into the details.
” The most linked and shared content also included “authoritative, research backed content, opinion forming journalism and major news sites.” There is a “sweet spot” that draws links and shares, which “includes content from popular domains such as major publishers.”
Goons Provide PR “Protection” , some journalists and forms of journalism can also be ethically suspect; which side, really, is the dark one? That’s because some think PR is just about spinning and deception. As I pointed out in my post News Corp.
Then a swashbuckling Internet billionaire comes along and crushes a well-known blog with his wallet, threatening free speech and the hallowed halls of journalism. The judge ruled that Hogan’s video was not protected journalism. Well, not exactly.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 48,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content