This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Wikipedia , “the world’s most successful online encyclopedia.” There are rules to keep each Wikipedia page “by the people” and not prejudicially written by the person. This post is about the potential risks Wikipedia may present to your organization and/or industry.
Corporate reputation has surpassed profitability in its importance to business success—today’s customers, employees, investors, and other stakeholders have many choices, and they are leaning toward companies with a stellar public image. In the age of social media, managing corporate reputation is a complex undertaking. Richard Branson.
But neither are their executives, who are just as vulnerable to online reputation attacks. To illustrate this, I wanted to use the example of two unique websites, Ripoff Report and Wikipedia. Meanwhile, false information about you may also be posted on Wikipedia, whether in articles about you or your company. By Whitney C.
As PR and marketing professionals – and consumers – we often forget about the sheer power and influence that Wikipedia has on our daily lives. Wikipedia is a permanent part of our public culture. All jokes aside, Wikipedia does have a distinct influence on the business community. Wikipedia is just plain popular.
Last month, Josh Greene , author of “Wikipedia for Business 2021: The Rules & Latest Developments that Businesses & Communicators Need to Know to Succeed,” shared his insights on the ins and outs of Wikipedia in a webinar moderated by Solo PR Pro President, Karen Swim. The purpose behind Wikipedia.
Thus, it is important for businesses and business owners to know how to handle potential online reputation attacks, whether that involves legal steps or handling matters on Yelp.com itself. On its “ FAQ ” page, Yelp warns uses of potential legal consequences for posting false information, while hyperlinking to the Wikipedia entry for “libel.”
Wikipedia remains a subject of great interest in PR and marketing circles. I have written about it before and even included a section on the internet encyclopedia in my book, How to Protect (Or Destroy) Your Reputation Online. Wikipedia is both a search engine darling and a status symbol for individuals and companies.
The definition of a crisis is: A negative situation or event that occurs that impacts, or risks impacting, the organization’s reputation and/or bottom line over the long-term. Source: Wikipedia).
Photo credit: Carrot and stick – Wikipedia. Dealing with Negative Criticism Internet Defamation Online Reputation Management' When faced with negative reviews, a good place to start is in considering these 5 techniques. The post How To Deal With Negative Reviews: Five Things to Consider appeared first on Agnes + Day.
You may have noticed that many companies are achieving online success and recognition from Wikipedia, and you may wonder why your company isn’t listed. Not too long ago, Wikipedia had a questionable reputation and often contained many factual errors. Perhaps more importantly, should it be?
Here, I thought I’d take the opposite approach – cite atypical PR missteps by brands that generally enjoy good reputations. Eventually Samsung completely killed the phone, but not before suffering significant damage in terms of reputation and sales. They mentioned isolated songs and albums they do like from the acts.
This sparked an advertiser exodus, as companies feared the impact on their reputation, significantly affecting X’s revenue. After Elon Musk acquired Twitter (now X) in 2022, his push for less restrictive moderation led to a rise in hate speech and misinformation.
It also includes the development of educational programs for young journalists and programs to assist the growth of reputable news outlets. Any time YouTube finds a questionable piece of video content, it will add a text box linking pertinent “factual” information supplied by Wikipedia. Facebook & Twitter.
He can poke humor at the brand without sacrificing the brand or its reputation. Images: Wikipedia , Terry Robinson (Creative Commons). He’s credible and, perhaps more importantly, perceived as trustworthy. Murdock has a role to play, too. He’s the humor that defuses situations. Know your vulnerabilities. Maybe a dose of B.A.
It’s a huge amount of data that includes books, websites, and Wikipedia. The first paragraph was factual and recognisable based on my Wikipedia entry. If it generates nonsense at best, or misinformation at worst, it has no place in helping an organisation promote its reputation.
As an old-school public relations consultant, I remember the days when “reputation management” was strictly a PR term. But then sometime in the past few years, reputation management was stolen from us by the search engine optimization world. If you don’t believe me, ask Wikipedia (cue groans.) Ouch, right?
This is particularly true on digital channels where the impact of old media articles in search engines or user-generated content like blogs and Wikipedia may not have moved on from a previous issue and could impact future media coverage. . We recently had a conversation with a public affairs client.
Online life can be addictive and endless, with perpetual anticipation of the next big thing and every brands’ reputation on the line. Maintaining your company’s reputation, demonstrating your positive culture, and looking after your own workforce will ensure people are tuned in and listening. Positive content is more viral.
Source: Wikipedia, which coincidentally can help you become one. And if you do it right, you can see big opportunities like paid speaking engagements, a book deal or even that Wikipedia page. appeared first on David PR Group | Public Relations, Reputation Management and Attorney Marketing. What is it? “A –John.
” According to Wikipedia, an “Employer brand” is the reputation of an employer, and its value proposition to its employees, as opposed to its more general corporate brand reputation and value proposition to customers.
Wikipedia defines public relations (PR) as the practice of deliberately managing the spread of information between an individual or an organization (such as a business, government agency, or a nonprofit organization) and the public. What does PR mean to your organization? PR is listening. PR is responding. PR is engaging.
The more reputable the linking site is, the more points the receiving webpage gets (for example, a link from the New York Times is worth a lot more than a link from a much smaller site). No follow vs follow links Now that you’ve got an understanding of how links work in SEO, we can drill into the no-follow vs follow debate.
Wikipedia says that “ small talk is a bonding ritual and a strategy for managing interpersonal distance …. At a social event, a receptive individual might be a familiar face, a person you know by reputation, or a person who is under-engaged.
In Wikipedia. The research on perception management is focused on how organisations can create a desired reputation : “The OPM [Organizational Perception Management] field focuses on the range of activities that help organisations establish and/or maintain a desired reputation (Staw et al., In Wikipedia. 3 Hargis, M. &
In Wikipedia. Source: Wikipedia PR professionals and communicators with a strong Theory of Mind can better understand their audience , create more compelling messages, and build lasting relationships. In Wikipedia. 1 Theory of mind. 2023, April 21). ANNOTATIONS [ + ] ANNOTATIONS 1 Theory of mind. 2023, April 21). 3 Hargis, M. &
Someone’s sensitivity and good intentions, communicating from their best morality, with the compass pointing in what they believe to be the “right” direction might not prove protective to reputation and could very well invite a firestorm of criticism. The Wikipedia synopsis about the story is below. How does this happen?
If an organisation wants to improve its reputation or build stronger relationships with its stakeholders, influencers, and publics, it must make more conscious decisions about what to measure. For example, if an organisation decides to measure the number of media mentions, it signals that media coverage is crucial in building its reputation.
“Opinion polls can lead to a ‘bandwagon effect’ where people adopt majority views, or a ‘underdog effect’ where people adopt minority views, potentially impacting social science predictions and pollsters’ professional reputations.” Source: Wikipedia 4 Hostile media effect. In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia. 2022, October 25).
Image: Wikipedia ) Gordon gained fame as a talent agent and manager for various high-profile celebrities, particularly in the music and culinary industries. The story contributed significantly to Cooper’s emerging reputation as a shocking and controversial performer. In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia.
Pavlov’s Inbox system is based on psychological ideas on how to reward and punish email behaviours in a socially viable manner (being rude as “punishment” might only be detrimental to your professional reputation ). In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia. In Wikipedia. 2 Classical conditioning.
Some might argue that SW Airlines’ purpose statement doesn’t provide benefit to global and local society, only global and local travellers – after all, according to Wikipedia , the aviation industry is responsible for 3.5% You’ll lose the halo effect of a good reputation. Furthermore, there’s the problem of definition.
In Wikipedia. It’s the Silent Switch where social networks have demoted the publisher’s authority and reputation and promoted single content performance instead. In Wikipedia. The marvel of algorithms is, contrary to popular belief, not their ability to sort signals. 1 Signal propagation delay. 2023, April 13). 2023, April 13).
Companies whose success in communications and reputation management largely depends on mastering those hierarchies will find themselves somewhat adrift. Late-2000s-to-Early-2010s: Chief-of-Staff calls, freaking out about the Wikipedia article about the company’s CEO. It’s a good thing, too -- what if the blogger agreed with the trolls?
Companies whose success in communications and reputation management largely depends on mastering those hierarchies will find themselves somewhat adrift. Late-2000s-to-Early-2010s: Chief-of-Staff calls, freaking out about the Wikipedia article about the company’s CEO. It’s a good thing, too -- what if the blogger agreed with the trolls?
Without a doubt it’s online reputation. It’s also common to come across companies who have trusted agencies with Wikipedia related work, but have consequently had their accounts banned and articles flagged. It’s my belief that the entire marketing mix should sit under the umbrella of PR because everything ties back into reputation.
Building a framework for reputation management: Christopher Rivera @ Samsung. Christopher Rivera, Director of Reputation & Risk, Samsung Electronics America. Chris Rivera has led as the Director of Reputation & Risk at Samsung Electronics America for more than three years. The reputation and risk landscape| Jump to text.
Go back on your values in a crisis and you’ll find yourself without credibility and with a reputation in major decline. Let’s pause a moment and reflect on the definition of a crisis: A situation or event that has, or threatens to have, a long-term negative impact on your organization’s reputation and/or bottom line.
There are a few standard “rules” to citing sources, too: First and foremost, never rely on Wikipedia. Washington Post Fact Checker: The reputable media outlet offers a fact-checking landing page, as well as a newsletter that myth-busts untrue or misleading rumors circulating online.
Digital journalism can mean many things according to Wikipedia: Digital journalism also known as online journalism is a contemporary form of journalism where editorial content is distributed via the Internet as opposed to publishing via print or broadcast. When the s**t hits the fan who do you want to turn to?
The database also has third-party activities which is where my 20 points for Communicate’s Reputation in Oil, Gas and Mining conference came from. CIPR Wikipedia Best Practice Guidance – 5 points. 10 and 5 point activities. Buzzing Communities – Richard Millington – 10 points.
An example of a hero of free authority: Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia.” I think there’s a mutual professional interest as well as enlightened self-interest; to improve the value and reputation of what we do. “Your brand/business is what you do; your reputation is what people remember and share.
It is a catchy book title, but let me clarify the term for you: Wikipedia says: the long tail is the colloquial name for a feature of statistical distributions. As the sheer number of outlets increased we shifted focus to less tangible angles and discussed corporate reputation ad nauseum. Then online came into being.
While most of the conference clarified recent actions, like site reputation abuse, one section discussed the partnerships the search team is making to adapt to the changing search landscape. A Knowledge Graph on the right also explains Online public relations, with a quick snippet from Wikipedia.
That is very different from the role of PR people, who are focused on protecting a client‘s reputation in the court of public opinion. It’s interesting to learn that President Trump’s attorney, William Cohen, is described on Wikipedia as “an American attorney who works as a lawyer and spokesperson for US President Donald Trump.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 48,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content